Skip to: site menu | section menu | main content

Old School 2.0

college teaching tools for the hip traditionalist

Archive for the 'Information Fluency' Category


Thank you for coming to the Poster Session!

One of the crowds at the Poster Session on Friday afternoonI had hoped to hand my camera to a stranger and get a nice picture of me smiling beside the poster session on Friday . . . but something MUCH better happened. This is the only shot I got because so many people came by that I never got a chance. The crowds at the poster sessions this year were downright Biblical in size and it was so validating to talk with so many other teaching librarians who are having some of the same challenges we have at UMW.

How do you help professors to remember what it’s like to be an undergraduate and guide them to respond to their students with research help that is appropriate for “beginning” researchers and truly helpful?

How do you introduce professors to the overwhelming new formats and technologies that have sprung up since they were doing their own intense library research for their dissertations?

And how do you do both of these things in a way that acknowledges faculty’s strong intelligence and deep commitment to scholarship and teaching and that cements the relationship between professors and librarians rather than straining it?

At the session, “Why do they do that? Helping Professors to Understand Undergraduate Information-Seeking Behavior (And Vice Versa)” I shared some tools that I used to try to address these challenges in a workshop for our First Year Seminar faculty. All 300 sets of handouts disappeared and at least 40 more people gave me their cards for follow-up. Thank you! Word versions of the documents are available on this site under the Toolkit tab, and I will be updating and adding other versions and materials when I get back to the campus next week.

PacMan worketh

I had a great time teaching today. One of the things I love about my job as a social sciences librarian is leading in-class library research strategy sessions. Among academic librarians, these things are called “one-shots” because you get one shot at instilling enough library skills in a roomful of students to tackle the assignments in a given course.

These sessions tend to cluster at the begining of each semester. Today I had two sessions of a Business Administration research methods class; one of an Education capstone class on legal and social issues in education; and one session for a First Year Seminar (intriguingly titled Cold Case: Mystery and History in the Theatre) on unresolved questions such as whether Thespis was really the first actor and who really wrote all the stuff attributed to Shakespeare. A very mixed bag indeed (and another thing I love about my job).

Fueled by my recent thinking about online gaming as a metaphor for Millennial learning and by enouraging comments from colleagues, I decided to try something new.

I decided to ask in each of the classes if anyone there was a gamer.

Interestingly, in the First Year Seminar, I got blank stares. Eleven out of twelve blank stares, to be exact. Since this was a group comprised entirely of freshmen, it made me wonder if we aren’t already experiencing a first wave of yet another generation. But the one guy who raised his hand was also the student had been most vocally involved in the search we had done as a group. He was the one who had caught a typing error. He was the one who had the “path” through the catalog mastered fastest.

In the Education session, I shared–as I often do with Education classes–that I was trying something new pedagogically and talked to them about the Nintendo metaphor. They were interested because they have a sense of how popular culture molds the students in their classroom.

In the Business research methods class, of all places, I hit the jackpot. I try hard, I try very hard, every semester to excite four successive rooms full of Business Administration majors about the prospect of a doing a literature review using scholarly sources. (I meet with two more sections tomorrow.) The dreaded literature review means, inevitably, that these students will be forced to master our link resolver.

In essence, the link resolver is a pop-up tool driven by a program that attempts to match a citation from an article database with a source for the article itself.

The sources are all over the map. They may be PDFs in other databases, or microfiche or microfilm in our collection, or bound journals.

The link resolver always leads to a second level . . . either to our catalog, or to interlibrary loan, or to a jillion possiblities for retrieving the article online. The catalog is standardized but the holdings information is arcane to the uninitiated. And the more than one hundred databases and electronic journal collections that the resolver draws article links from–such as JSTOR and LexisNexis and Expanded Academic ASAP–all have different interfaces and opening screens and entry points.

In the past, at the point at which I introduce the link resolver, I have warned of dragons and apologized profusely for the messy state of information in the year 2007.

Today, I asked if anyone in the class was a gamer.

“Yeah,” one startled guy replied.

“So when you have a new game, how do you approach it?”

“I just start playing.”

“And how do you learn how to play?”

“I just keep trying things.”

“Oh,” I said–and I could tell the class wondered where this was going. “You just jump in and try things.”

Heads nodded–and not because they were falling asleep.

“Well that’s what you’ll have to do with this Locate Journal Article box.”

“Do you mean,” asked another student with that light-dawning look, “That finding stuff in the library is like playing a game?”

I was so cranked up that I gave him a high five. And he was so surprised to see an old lady reliving the 80s that he graciously gave me one back.

PacMan worketh. Or PacMan work-ed in that one class. I’ll try it again tomorrow.

Posted by charlotte on January 19th, 2007